Susan holmes full#
"When the full context is viewed, it is crystal clear to everyone what Ms. After checking the box stating Holmes had a child in common with Morris, she further explains on the form how exactly she believes they are connected - through Morris fatally shooting her son. He argued Holmes did not knowingly lie on the form and genuinely believes she and Morris share a child in common because Morris fatally shot her son. The phrase "child in common" is not further defined on the form, which is designed to be filled out by someone without an attorney, and the entire extreme risk protection order law and documents are poorly written, Holmes' defense attorney Matthew Landers said during this week's trial. Holmes told reporters after that hearing that "I do not feel I've perjured myself."ĭE-ESCALATION: Fort Collins first responders hope Vitals app will improve interactions, de-escalation 16, 2020, and Howard denied the petition after Holmes declined to provide evidence that she was a family or household member with Morris. In finding Holmes guilty of both charges, jurors decided Holmes and Morris do not share a child in common and that Holmes knowingly lied on the petition and attempted to influence the chief judge at the time, Judge Stephen Howard, into granting the petition.Ī hearing was held on the petition in front of Howard on Jan. Both officers were cleared from wrongdoing by the district attorney at the time of the shooting, Cliff Riedel. 9, 2020, Holmes checked a box saying she is a family or household member of Morris - one of two officers involved in the fatal shooting of her son, 19-year-old Jeremy Holmes, on July 1, 2017 - specifically that she has a child in common with Morris.
0 kommentar(er)
